CO129-102 - Public Offices - 1864 — Page 68

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

66

Whose legal opinion on all questions arising out of Shipping Insurance transactions the Crown Agents place much confidence.

From the inverted copy of Messrs Green & Allin's letter it appears that they think that the Hong Kong Government has no right to recover from W. Kitto, the registered owner, for the conveyance of the shipwrecked passengers to that Colony; that it was not competent to Williamson, the master of the Arduille, to make any contract on behalf of his owner to pay for such services which would be binding and that the action to recover £104:3.4 against him, the owner W. Kitto, could not be successfully maintained.

7 April 1864.

But Messrs Green & Allin point out that mention is made in the correspondence (see concluding portion of second paragraph of the Acting Harbor Master's letter of 19 Feb 1863, enclosed in the Governor's despatch No.63 of 15th March 1863) that some Bill upon the Government was drawn by Williamson and are of opinion that if such Bill was drawn by Williamson or the Government of Hong Kong made the advance to Williamson upon his credit, and they are able to prove it, then he is the person who is responsible and may be made to pay that sum.

As there is reason to suppose that Captain Williamson is still in Hong Kong, and as the local Government...

Edit History

2026-05-19 08:42:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
66 Whose legal opinion on all questions arising out of Shipping Insurance transactions the Crown Agents place much confidence. From the inverted copy of Messrs Green & Allin's letter it appears that they think that the Hong Kong Government has no right to recover from W. Kitto, the registered owner, for the conveyance of the shipwrecked passengers to that Colony; that it was not competent to Williamson, the master of the Arduille, to make any contract on behalf of his owner to pay for such services which would be binding and that the action to recover £104:3.4 against him, the owner W. Kitto, could not be successfully maintained. 7 April 1864. But Messrs Green & Allin point out that mention is made in the correspondence (see concluding portion of second paragraph of the Acting Harbor Master's letter of 19 Feb 1863, enclosed in the Governor's despatch No.63 of 15th March 1863) that some Bill upon the Government was drawn by Williamson and are of opinion that if such Bill was drawn by Williamson or the Government of Hong Kong made the advance to Williamson upon his credit, and they are able to prove it, then he is the person who is responsible and may be made to pay that sum. As there is reason to suppose that Captain Williamson is still in Hong Kong, and as the local Government...
Baseline (Original)
Ad 66 whone legal ofinion on all questions arising out of Shipping Insmance transactions the Crown Rfeats place mach confidence From the invexed copy of Messr Green & Allin's letter it appears that they think that the Hong Kong Goverment to recover has n-o right from W. Kitto the registered onner for the convezance of the shipwrecked passengers to that Colony; that it was not competent Williamson, the master of the Arduille to make his oroner any Contract my behalf of to pay for such services which would be binding and that an ₤104:34. to ση him the betion to recover could not be successfully maintained # $ maintained 7 April 1864. the owner W. Kitto. against But Mef Jeeen + Allin pomit out that mention is made in the correspondeu ce ( see concluding portion of second paragrafle of the Acting Harbor Master's letter of 19 Fely 1863, enclosed in the Governa's despatch N.63 of 15th March 1863) Droner, and are of some Bill upon the of opinion that is such Bill was drawn by Williamson or the Sovemment of Hong Kong made the advance to Williamson upon his credit, and they are able to prove it, then be is the person who is responsible for, be made to pay, and may As there is that sum. to suppose that Captain Williness is got in Hong Kong, and as the local Soremment le nd ard Qus 3
2026-05-19 08:42:37 · Baseline
View content

Ad

66

whone legal ofinion on all questions arising out of Shipping

Insmance

transactions the Crown Rfeats place

mach confidence

From the invexed copy of Messr Green & Allin's letter it appears that they

think that the Hong Kong Goverment

to

recover

has

n-o

right

from W. Kitto

the registered

onner

for

the

convezance

of the shipwrecked passengers to that Colony; that it was not competent

Williamson, the master of the Arduille

to make

his oroner

any

Contract

my

behalf of

to pay for such services

which would be binding and that

an

₤104:34.

to

ση

him

the

betion to recover

could not be successfully

maintained

#

$

maintained

7 April 1864.

the

owner W. Kitto.

against But Mef Jeeen + Allin pomit out that

mention is made in the correspondeu ce

( see concluding portion of second paragrafle of the Acting Harbor Master's letter of 19 Fely 1863, enclosed in the Governa's despatch N.63 of 15th March 1863)

Droner,

and

are

of

some Bill upon the

of opinion that is such

Bill was drawn by Williamson

or the

Sovemment of Hong Kong made the advance

to Williamson upon his credit, and

they

are able to prove it, then be is the person who is responsible for, be made to pay,

and

may

As there is

that sum.

to suppose

that Captain Williness is got

in Hong Kong, and as

the local

Soremment

le

nd

ard

Qus

3

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.